Ravi Bakshi v. The State NCT Of Delhi & ANR.
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5984/2022 & CRL.M.A. 23474/2022 RAVI BAKSHI ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr.Paranjay Chopra, Adv.
along with petitioner in person.
versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Mr.Aman Usman, APP with SI Nisha R-2 in person (through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 09.02.2024 1.
This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, 'Cr.P.C.') seeking quashing of the FIR No.0248/2016 registered at Police Station: Vasant Vihar, South District, Delhi under Section 354(A) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, 'IPC'), along with all other proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of a settlement.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties, that is, the petitioner and the respondent no.2 have amicably settled their inter se disputes. They have filed their respective affidavits affirming the settlement between them.
3.
The respondent no.2, who is present in Court (through VC) and has been duly identified by the Investigating Officer (IO), affirms the settlement and states that she has settled all the disputes with the petitioner of her own free will and without any coercion. The The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
respondent no.2 submits that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.
4.
I have perused the contents of the FIR, Charge Sheet and also the settlement between the parties.
5.
Keeping in view the fact that the respondent no.2 does not wish to pursue her complaint any further, as also the Settlement arrived at between the parties, I find that no useful purpose shall be served in continuing with the proceedings of the present FIR as the chances of its success will be rather minuscule and it would rather create further acrimony between the parties and will be an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer.
6.
Guided by the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in its judgments in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303; Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinbhai Karmur & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors. (2017) 9 SCC 641 and State of Haryana & Ors. v. Bhajan Lal & Ors. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 3, this Court deems it appropriate, in the interest of justice, to exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
7.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No.0248/2016 registered at Police Station: Vasant Vihar, South-District, Delhi under Section 354A of the IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioner are quashed, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit costs of Rs.50,000/- with 'We The People Abhiyan' [A/c no. 60276446157, Bank of Maharashtra, Branch Indiranagar;
MICR Code:
422014009;
IFS Code:
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
MAHB0001180], within a period of four weeks from today, and file proof of such deposit with the Registry of this Court and also supply a copy thereof to the IO, within the said period. 8.
The petition is disposed of in the above terms. NAVIN CHAWLA, J FEBRUARY 9, 2024/ns/ss Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.