Rakesh Kumar v. Bhim Kaur

$~5 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RC.REV. 194/2024 & CM APPL. 41245/2024 RAKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, Adv.

versus BHIM KAUR .....Respondent Through:

Mr.

Kailash Kumar Sharma, Advocate via video-conferencing.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 22.04.2025 After hearing detailed submissions in the matter, it transpires that the essential ground on which leave-to-defend was sought by the appellant (tenant) was that the respondent (landlord) had failed to make-out a case of bona fide requirement; and had also failed to explain how she does not have any suitable, alternate accommodation for accommodating the needs of her younger son. 2.

However, a perusal of the impugned judgement would show, that in para 8 thereof the learned Rent Controller has dealt with the manner in which property bearing No. B-79, Gali No.8, Bhagat Singh Marg, Shalimar Village, Delhi is under the use and occupation of the respondent as well as her elder son, daughter and other relatives. 3.

Learned Rent Controller has also dealt with how the respondent has been able to substantiate her bona fide need for property bearing No. 3390, Arya Pura, Subzi Mandi, Delhi, which was tenanted to the petitioner some 70 years ago at the rent of Rs. 19/- per month. RC.REV. 194/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:34:26

4.

The court is also informed that the possession of the subject premises has already been surrendered to the respondent in the execution proceedings filed by her.

5.

Upon an overall conspectus of the facts and circumstances of the case, and upon perusal of the impugned judgement, this court finds no ground to interfere with the impugned judgement in its revisional jurisdiction under section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958.

6.

This court is satisfied that the order of the learned Rent Controller is in accordance with law and calls for no interference. 7.

In the circumstances, the revision petition is dismissed. 8.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 22, 2025 V.Rawat RC.REV. 194/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:34:26