← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/9752/2025

Puneet Yadav v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And ORS.

2025-09-22Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mini Pushkarna4 pages

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9752/2025 PUNEET YADAV .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Farid Abbas and Mr. Nishant Kaushik, Advocates versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Kirti Garg, Advocate for BSES Mr. Shaurya Abrol, Advocate for MCD (through VC) Mr. Pramod Kumar and Mr. Azhar Kamal Quadri, Advocates for GNCTD Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SC with Mr.

Apoorv Upmanyu and Mr. Harsh Vashisht, Advocates for STF Mob: 9810047321 Email: amahajan@mlo.co.in

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA % 22.09.2025

O R D E R

1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent no.1 - Municipal Corporation of Delhi ("MCD"), to carry out the demolition of the extended area of balcony in the property bearing No. WZ225, Madipur Village, New Delhi-110063. 2.

This Court notes that a Status Report dated 19th September, 2025, has been filed on behalf of MCD, which reads as under: The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

"xxx xxx xxx The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

3.

Perusal of the aforesaid Status Report shows that a Demolition Order dated 11th August, 2025, has been passed by the MCD. Subsequently, the owner/occupier of the property in question filed a writ petition before this Court, i.e., W.P.(C) 9752/2025, and vide order dated 27th August, 2025, this Court had granted interim protection in view of the fact that there is no Presiding Officer in the Appellate Tribunal, MCD ("ATMCD") currently. 4.

Accordingly, MCD is held bound to take action against the unauthorized construction existing in the property in question, subject to any orders that may be passed by the ATMCD.

5.

This Court further notes that an interim stay is already operating in favour of the owner/occupier of the property in question. 6.

Noting the aforesaid, the present writ petition, is accordingly disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 ak The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.