Rajbeer Singh And ANR v. State Election Commission And ORS

$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 990/2017 & C.M. No. 4613/2017 RAJBEER SINGH AND ANR.

..... Petitioners Through: Mr. A. Maitri, Advocate with Ms. Radhika Chandrashekhar, Advocate.

versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, SC with Mr. Siddharth Nagpal, Advocate and Mr. S.C. Arora, (Consultant) for R-1/SEC.

Mr. P.R. Chopra, Advocate for R-2/ECI.

Mr. R.A. Iyer, Advocate with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Advocate for R-3/GNCTD.

+ W.P.(C) 1042/2017 DHARAM CHOUDHARY .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Mehta with Mr. Gaurav Chaudhary, Advocates.

versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, DELHI & ANR. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, SC with Mr. Siddharth Nagpal, Advocate and Mr. S.C. Arora, (Consultant) for R-1/SEC.

Mr. R.A. Iyer, Advocate with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Advocate for R-2/GNCTD.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

O R D E R

% 14.02.2017 WP(C) 990/2017 & 1042/2017 Page 1 of 2

1.

Learned counsels for the petitioners state that in view of the Notification issued by the respondent No.1/SEC as recently as on 06.2.2017, they seek leave to withdraw the present petitions, while reserving the right of the petitioners to file fresh petitions against the said Notification, if considered necessary.

2.

Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petitions are disposed of along with pending applications.

HIMA KOHLI, J FEBRUARY 14, 2017 ap WP(C) 990/2017 & 1042/2017 Page 2 of 2