Ravinder Singh v. State Of NCT Delhi & ANR

$~65 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 783/2018 RAVINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr V.Elanchezhuja Raashid, Advocate.

versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through :

Mr Arun Kumar Sharma, APP.

SI Mahesh Chand.

Mr Rakesh K.Khanna, Senior Advocate with Mr Ankur Yadav and Mr Narender Sharma, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 15.02.2018 Crl. M.A. 2862/2018(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 783/2018 1.

On the oral prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr Barun Chakravarty is added as petitioner No.2. Amended memo of parties as well as the affidavit of petitioner No.1 and Mr Ravinder Singh, the petitioner and Mr Barun Chakravarty, newly added petitioner, is taken on record.

2.

The affidavit of respondent No.2 is also taken on record. 3.

Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.117/2017 under Sections 354/341/427/506/509/34 IPC; Police Station Lajpat Nagar, on the basis of a Settlement. Parties are stated to be neighbours. 4.

It is contended that the subject disputes emanate out of some misunderstanding.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that they have unconditionally withdrawn the allegations made against respondent No.2 and have amicably settled their disputes with respondent No.2. Affidavit to the said effect has been filed.

6.

Learned senior counsel for respondent No.2 disputes the averments made in the petition, however, under instructions from respondent No.2, who is present in Court, confirms that the Settlement has taken place and respondent No.2 does not wish to press criminal charges against the petitioner. 7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that there are no disputes surviving in favour of any of the parties against each other and all disputes are fully and finally settled and both of them undertake that they shall not initiate any proceedings against each other in the future.

8.

In view of the above and keeping in view of the fact that the parties are neighbours and have resolved their disputes and respondent No. 2 does not wish to press her complaint and further that

all disputes are fully and finally settled and both of them undertake that they shall not initiate any proceedings against each other in the future, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

9.

Accordingly, FIR No.117/2017 under Sections 354/341/427/506/509/34 IPC; Police Station Lajpat Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are hereby quashed. 10.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J FEBRUARY 15, 2018 'Sn'