← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./7887/2023

Wali Mohammad And Others v. The State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) And ANR.

2024-01-30Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri2 pages

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7887/2023 WALI MOHAMMAD AND OTHERS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Abdul Rauf, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person.

versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with W/SI Himanshu, P.S. Ranhola.

Respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 30.01.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 874/2016 registered under Sections 498-A/406/506/34 IPC at P.S. Ranhola, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and petitioner No.1. 3.

Mr. Sabharwal, learned APP for the State, submits that in the present case petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No. 2 is the only complainant/victim.

4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that after ironing out their differences the parties have settled their disputes and are happily living together since about four years.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2024 at 12:44:31

5.

Petitioner No.1 is present in Court and has been identified by his counsel as well as by the IO/W/SI Himanshu, P.S. Ranhola. 6.

Respondent No. 2, who is also present in Court and identified by the I.O., states that she has been happily living with her husband i.e., petitioner No. 1 since March, 2020 and as of now she has no complaint against her husband or any other petitioner. She further states that she is giving this statement out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She also states that she has no objection if the present FIR and the consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements and undertaking made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JANUARY 30, 2024 ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2024 at 12:44:31