Rahul v. State Of ( NCT) Of Delhi

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 386/2016 RAHUL ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.A.K.Pandey, Adv versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP for the State with SI Vishvendra, PS Seemapuri, Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

O R D E R

% 22.02.2016 Crl.M.A. No.3101/2016 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

BAIL APPLN. 386/2016 After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition. Permission is granted, as prayed for.

This Court expects from learned Trial Court to expedite the trial.

Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SURESH KAIT, J FEBRUARY 22, 2016 M