Satish Kubda @ Ajay v. State

$~8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2788/2019 and CRL.M.A. 39849/2019 SATISH KUBDA @ AJAY ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Jitender Tyagi and Mr Ajay Chaudhary, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms Kusum Dhalla, APP for State.

SI Ajeet Kumar, P.S. Sungam Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 28.01.2020 1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No. 205/2015, under Sections 302/201/411/120-B of the IPC, registered with Police Station Sangam Vihar. 2.

The status report indicates that 34 witnesses have been examined and examination-in-chief of the Investigating Officer is yet to be completed. 3.

Ms Dhalla, learned APP states that apart from the Investigating Officer, there are no other witnesses proposed to be examined. Considering the stage of trial, this Court considers it apposite to request the Trial Court to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today.

4.

In view of the above, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

seeks to withdraw the present petition.

5.

The petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JANUARY 28, 2020 RK