Rajmani v. Union Of India & ANR.

$~143 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9920/2025 & CM APPL. 41332/2025 RAJMANI .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Abhishek Ritabh Shukla, Ms. Chahat Raghav and Ms. Sneha Agarwal, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Devender Singh, JAG, ITBP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 15.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1.

As the representation of the petitioner for challenging of his place of posting has been rejected without reasons, Mr. Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner, after some hearing, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition, with a direction to the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's representation and in case they are rejecting it, to provide reasons therefrom.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. W.P.(C) 9920/2025 Signed By:AAKANSHA SHARMA 13:38:35

3.

The respondents would pass a fresh order on the petitioner's representation within a period of four weeks from today and communicate it to the petitioner forthwith.

4.

We make it clear that the respondents should provide reasons, howsoever brief for rejecting the representation. 5.

We also make it clear that we are not interdicting the transfer of the petitioner. The petitioner is required to report at his place of posting forthwith.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

AJAY DIGPAUL, J.

JULY 15, 2025/sk W.P.(C) 9920/2025 Signed By:AAKANSHA SHARMA 13:38:35