Rajesh Chaudhary v. State & ANR.
$~1 &2 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELIH AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 2797/2019 RAJESH CHAUDHARY Petitioner Through; Mr. Rabindra Singh, Advocate, versus STATE & ANR.
Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State y Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate for R-2.
+ V.BAIL APPLN. 2798/2019 POOJA CHAUDI-IARY Petitioner Through: Mr. Rabindra Singh, Advocate.
Versus
STATE & ANR.
Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State.
Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
ORDER
% 20.11.2019 CRL.M.A. 39884/2019 (Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN. 2797/2019 CRL.M.A. 39886/2019 (Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN. 2798/2019 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.
The applications stand disposed of.
BAIL APPLN.
2797/2019 BAIL APPLN. 2798/2019 1.
The present bail applications have been filed under Section 43 8 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 331/2019, under Sections 498-A/406/323/354/376/511 IPG, registered at P.S. Mahila Thana, Hanumangarh Jn. Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on his oral request the present bail applications be considered for grant of transit bail only. By:AMULYA
> 3.
Learned eounsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner Pooja Chaudhary is the wife of the petitioner Rajesh Chaudhary. He further submits that the petitioners are brother-in-law (Nandoi) and sister-in-law (Nanad) of the complainant respectively. Pie further submits that the petitioners received a phone call from SI Sandhya, the 10 of the case that the petitioners are wanted in the aforesaid FIR. Pie further submits that the petitioners have a reasonable apprehension of being arrest in this case. He further submits that the petitioners have been residing separately along with their two children. It is further submitted that petitioner Pooja Chaudhary's brother Vishal Sharma, the husband of the complainant, expired on 12.05.2019, whereafter the complainant has made the present allegations. 4.
Without going into the merits of the case, the petitioners are granted transit anticipatory bail in the above case for a period of 10 days from today to enable them to approach the concemed Court at Rajasthan and move an appropriate application. In the meantime, in the event of their arrests, the petitioners shall be released on transit anticipatory bail, on their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Police Officer. It is clarified that this order shall elapse at the expiry of the said period. 5.
The bail applications stand disposed of in the above terms. 6.
A copy of this order be given dasti, under the signatures of Court Master, to the learned eounsel for the parties. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J NOVEMBER 20, 2019 p'ma/ 'dc'