Capt Anil Kumar Mohindru v. Rajat Chakraborty

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 86/2018 CAPT ANIL KUMAR MOHINDRU ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv. (Mobile No. 9810868162) versus RAJAT CHAKRABORTY ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv.

CORAM:

SH.

RAKESH KUMAR (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

O R D E R

% 10.01.2019 In compliance of previous direction, learned counsel for plaintiff submitted that he has filed application for filing additional documents u/O 7 R 14 (2) CPC vide diary no. 568139 dated 15.12.2018 which is not on record. Learned counsel for plaintiff is directed to get the same placed on record within seven days. Copy of above noted application already supplied and learned counsel for defendant also submitted that he has also filed reply vide diary no. 26401 dated 08.01.2019 which is also not on record. Learned counsel for defendant is directed to get the same placed on record within seven days. Copy supplied to learned counsel for plaintiff, which is not disputed.

In view of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Court vide order dated 22.11.2018 in CS COMM) 95/2016 titled as MAX

HYPERMARKET INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS. CURO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, registry is directed to put this application along with reply before the Hon'ble Court as and when both application and reply come on record.

Put up for further proceedings on 24.01.2019. RAKESH KUMAR (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) JANUARY 10, 2019 NR