Mohd. Nasir v. State & ANR.

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 388/2017 MOHD. NASIR ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Tushar Saanu, Advocate for the State along with Inspector Rakesh Kumar, ATO Malviya Nagar and ASI Ram Lal, IO, P.S. Malviya Nagar.

Mr. Raja Ram Solanki, Advocate for respondent no.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 06.02.2017 Crl.M.A.2076/2017(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 388/2017 This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner to produce his minor daughter. The complaint of the petitioner is that his minor daughter is missing since 07.01.2017. On an advance copy having been served, the daughter of the petitioner has been produced in Court. She submits that she has voluntarily married Junaid Ansari and she wishes to reside with him. Along with the status report, a typed copy of the order dated

20.01.2017 passed in Writ Petition No.2890/2017 by a Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court granting protection to the married couple has been annexed.

In view of the order passed by the Allahabad High Court, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate legal remedies available in accordance with law. G.S.SISTANI, J JAYANT NATH, J FEBRUARY 06, 2017 pst/ W.P.(CRL) 388/2017 2/2