← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.A./388/2011

Brian C Escrader v. State

2017-03-29Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul1 pages

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 388/2011 BRIAN C ESCRADER ..... Appellant Represented by:

Ms. Saakshi Agrawal, Adv. for applicant/ surety.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with SI Lalit Kumar PS pandav Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 29.03.2017 CRL.A. 388/2011 Learned APP for the State on instructions submits that the factum of death of the appellant has been verified.

CRL.A. 388/2011 stands abated and is disposed of as such. Crl.M.A. 3179/2017 By this application the father of the appellant who stood surety for him when his sentence was suspended seeks discharge of surety for the reason the appellant has passed away. Since factum of death of the appellant has been verified, the surety bond furnished by the father of the appellant is discharged.

Application is disposed of.

Trial Court Record be sent back.

MUKTA GUPTA, J MARCH 29, 2017 /'ga'