M/S Bharat Motors v. Cnh Industrial India Pvt. Ltd
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 982/2025 M/S BHARAT MOTORS .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Satyender Saharan, Mr. Keshav Baheti, Ms. Aanchal Maheshwari, Ms. Deepshikha Singh, Advs.
versus CNH INDUSTRIAL INDIA PVT. LTD ....Respondent Through:
Mr. Niraj Singh, Ms. Vibhuti Khandelwal, Mr. Kishan, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R
% 14.10.2025 1.
This is a petition filed under Section 11(5) & (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
2.
The facts are that the respondent had entered into an Agreement dated 06.09.2022 with the petitioner for sales, distribution, spares and service support of the respondent company's product.
3.
The said Agreement contains an arbitration clause being Clause No. 30, which reads as under:
"30. Dispute Resolution 30.1 Except for any actions to enforce or to collect credit instruments or forfeiture of the security deposit maintained by the Dealer with the Company in pursuance to the terms of this Agreement, Parties agree that all dispute between the Parties arising out of or in relation to this Agreement will be settled The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
between the Parties through friendly consultations and negotiations. For the above, the Parties undertake to hold such consultation and negotiation in good faith, and shall ensure that the same is attended by persons with decision making authority regarding the dispute. If no settlement can be reached through friendly consultations and negotiations within 30 (Thirty) days of one Party delivering a notice of the dispute to the other Party, then such dispute will be finally settled by arbitration in accordance with the provisions of this Clause 30. 30.2 The arbitration proceedings will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended from time to time ("Arbitration Act").
The proceedings shall commence upon issuance of an arbitration notice ("Arbitration Notice") after following the procedure set out in clause 30.1 above. 30.3 The arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended from time to time ("Arbitration Act").
The arbitration shall be conducted by a single arbitrator ("Sole Arbitrator"), selected by the Dealer from a panel of three (3) persons not lower than the rank of retired district court judge, nominated by the Managing Director of the Company for the purpose of such selection, and should the Dealer fail to select the Sole Arbitrator within 15 (Fifteen) days of the panel of names of such nominees being furnished by the Managing Director of the Company for the purpose, the Sole Arbitrator shall be selected by the Managing Director of the Company out of the said panel The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
and such an appointment by the Company shall be binding on the Parties.
30.4 New Delhi will be the seat of the arbitration. The arbitration proceedings will be held at New Delhi and the language to be used in the arbitral proceedings will be English. The cost of arbitration including the fees of the arbitrator shall and apportioned and equally shared between the Parties. The arbitrator will decide any dispute strictly in accordance with the governing Law specified in Clause 29 of this Agreement. Any award made by the arbitrator will be final and binding on each of the parties to the dispute.
30.5 The Parties will co-operate in good faith to expedite (to the maximum extent practicable) the conduct of any arbitral proceedings commenced under this Agreement. When any dispute is under arbitration, except for the matters under dispute, the parties will continue to exercise their remaining respective rights and fulfil their remaining respective obligations under this Agreement."
4.
Since disputes arose between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide Legal Notice dated 30.04.2025 and thereafter, filed the present petition.
5.
Mr. Singh, learned counsel appears for the respondent and states that he has no objection to the present petition being allowed. 6.
I am satisfied that there is a valid arbitration clause and the disputes between the parties which need to be adjudicated by way of arbitral mechanism.
7.
For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the following directions The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
are issued:- i) Mr. Amol Sinha (Advocate) (Mob. No. 9560020333) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. ii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis and rules of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the 'DIAC'). iii) The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators' Fees) Rules, 2018. iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the 1996 Act prior to entering into the reference. v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims and merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator.
vi) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.
8.
The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JASMEET SINGH, J OCTOBER 14, 2025/sp The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.