Jitender Kumar Pathak v. The State Of N.C.T & ANR

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 755/2016 JITENDER KUMAR PATHAK ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Ms. Rakshi Dubey, Advocate.

Versus

THE STATE OF N.C.T & ANR.

..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Surender, P.S. Bawana.

Mr.Sudhakar Singh, Advocate for Complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

O R D E R

% 22.02.2016 CRL.M.C. 755/2016 & Crl. M.A. No. 3199/2016 1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh. 2.

Permission granted as prayed for.

3.

Accordingly, the instant petition alongwith pending application is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the compromise deed dated 10.02.2016 annexed to the petition is removed and handed over to the counsel in Court. Photocopy thereof is placed on record. SURESH KAIT, J.

FEBRUARY 22, 2016 sb