Delhi Transport Corporation v. Tata Motors Limited

$~60 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 551/2024 and IA 34585/2024 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Rikky Gupta, Standing Counsel with Ms. Ananya Singh, Advocates versus TATA MOTORS LIMITED .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Nandini Gore, Ms. Swati Bhardwaj, Mr. Rajat Dasgupta and Ms.

Manvi Rastogi, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (ORAL) % 29.07.2024 1.

This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the 1996 Act) for extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal in seisin of the dispute between the parties.

2.

The mandate of the learned arbitrator is stated to have expired on 22 July 2024.

3.

Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection. 4.

Accordingly, the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal stands extended by six months from today.

OMP(MISC)(COMM) 551/2024 KUMAR 17:22:24 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR 17:21:43

5.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

JULY 29, 2024/yg Click here to check corrigendum, if any OMP(MISC)(COMM) 551/2024 KUMAR 17:22:24 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR 17:21:43