← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10037/2025

Tasabbur Husain v. The Commissioner Of Customs & ORS.

2025-09-10Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Shail Jain3 pages

$~9 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 10037/2025 TASABBUR HUSAIN .....Petitioner Through:

Mohd. Ather Ansari, Mr. Mazhar Sidique and Mohd. Salman, Advocates.

versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr.

Naman Choula, Adv.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

O R D E R

% 10.09.2025 1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2.

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking release of the detained gold bar, weighing 116 grams, which was seized by the Customs Department vide Detention Receipt bearing no. DR/INDEL4/11-02-2024/003753 dated 11th February, 2024.

3.

The case of the Petitioner is that he travelled from Saudi Arabia to New Delhi on 11th February, 2024. Upon arrival at the Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi, the Petitioner was intercepted by the concerned officials of the Customs Department and the gold bar of the Petitioner was seized. The detention receipt was also issued to the Petitioner. However, thereafter, no Show Cause Notice (hereinafter, 'SCN') has been issued to the Petitioner and no order has also been passed by the Adjudicating Authority. 4.

Ms. Narain, ld. SSC for the Respondents relies upon the statement signed by the Petitioner whereby the Petitioner has waived off the SCN and the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

personal hearing.

5.

Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to reexport the detained gold bar. 6.

Once the goods are detained, it is mandatory to issue a SCN and afford a hearing to the Petitioner. The time prescribed under Section 110 of The Customs Act, 1962, is a period of six months and subject to complying with the formalities, a further extension for a period of six months can be taken by the Customs Department for issuing the SCN. In this case, the one year period itself has elapsed, thus no SCN can be issued. The detention is therefore impermissible.

7.

Accordingly, let the Petitioner appear before the Customs Department for appraisement and the Customs Department may pass an order allowing reexport of the seized gold bar, subject to some reasonable terms and conditions, bearing in mind the fact that the Petitioner is working as a driver in Saudi Arabia.

8.

Let the Petitioner appear before the Customs Department on 23rd September, 2025 at 11:00 AM in person or through an Authorised Representative, in which case, a proper email from the Petitioner or some form of communication to be sent to the Customs Department that the Petitioner has authorised the concerned Authorised Representative to appear on behalf of the Petitioner.

9.

The Nodal Officer mentioned below shall facilitate the Petitioner's appearance before the competent authority for compliance with the present order:

Mr. Sandeep Lamba, Superintendent, Customs Office of Commissioner, Customs The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

IGI Airports, T-3, New Delhi Mobil No.7405345000 Email id: igilegaldelhi@gmail.com 10.

The petition is disposed of in these terms. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

SHAIL JAIN, J.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2025/dk/ck The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.