Ram Sakha Yadav & ANR v. Meenu & ANR (Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd)

$~13 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAC.APP.

876/2019, CM APPL.

49264/2019, CM APPL.

50324/2024 RAM SAKHA YADAV & ANR .....Appellants Through:

None versus MEENU & ANR (IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD) .....Respondent Through:

Counsel for R1.

Ms.

Suman Bagga, Advocate for respondent no.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 08.11.2024 1.

None has appeared on behalf of the Appellants. 2.

Learned Counsel for the Insurance Company/Respondent No. 1 submits that this Appeal has been preferred by the Driver-Owner of the offending vehicle, who have sought reduction of the amount awarded to the Claimants, as compensation. It is further submitted that the recovery rights have been granted to the Insurance Company against the owner for recovery of compensation amount. Further, an Appeal bearing MAC. APP. No. 573/2019 was filed on behalf of the Claimants seeking enhancement of the compensation amount. The same has been disposed of vide Order dated 28.02.2023 whereby the compensation has been enhanced. The present Appellants/driver-owner were also a party in the said MAC APP No. 573/2019.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:07:03

3.

Once, the enhancement has been permitted, nothing survives in the present Appeal. Moreover, none is present on behalf of the Appellants. 4.

The Appeal is dismissed in default with pending Applications. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 8, 2024/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:07:03