Dhananjay Singh v. State

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 588/2016 DHANANJAY SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 04.03.2016 The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of parole to the petitioner on the medical ground that the petitioner's mother is suffering from cardiac ailments. Upon verification by the Police it has been ascertained that the mother of the petitioner is stated to undergo treatment for severe cardiac problem at PGIMS, Lucknow, U.P. Ms. Richa Kapoor, learned Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official Respondent states that in view of the aforesaid they do not oppose the relief prayed for in the present petition. In view of the foregoing, I see no impediment in allowing the present writ petition.

Consequently, the petitioner is released on parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent subject to the following conditions:- (v) During the period the petitioner remains out on parole, he shall provide the SHO of the concerned police station with his mobile telephone number which he undertakes to keep operational.

(vi) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.

With the above said directions, the writ petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

A copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for necessary information and compliance.

Dasti.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MARCH 04, 2016 bp