Vijay Vaidh v. State

$~45 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 519/2018 VIJAY VAIDH ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Anuj Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Namita Wali, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with SI Raj Kumar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 19.02.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report is on record. Address of the petitioner has been verified. 2.

Nominal Roll dated 05.02.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 307/376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with total fine `25,000/-. Crl.A.932/2016 was dismissed by this Court on 06.06.2017. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone three years, seven months and five days incarceration besides remission for five months and seven days as on 31.01.2018. It further reveals that he is not involved

in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. He has not availed any interim bail or parole during his detention.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted two weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J FEBRUARY 19, 2018 / tr