Girish Solanki v. Union Of India And ANR

if •- I • . '

>;\$~37^d39- '

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

.• / GIRISHSOLANKI V .

„;

Petitioner ;/ '

.

, , •Through: . Ms. SeemaShamia,Advocate:

- J ^ -.versus; • 7 , • ' , " , •' , ' • /• / ;

'

'

UNIONOF INDIAAND ANR , '

.....Respondents / ;

^ / '

.

'

Through Mr.RajeshKumar,Advocate.

.- ;

^ //'

•,,'•39 • ;• .v„ "

• ^W.P.(C)1037/2017, ^ '

, '

• ^ CHFaSHSOLANKI , , '

, • ; ' .....Pptition^ .

,, . . ^ Through Ms; Seenia Shanna, Advocate.- ..

versus'V . '

' '

\'

^ r '

UNIONOF INDIAAND ANR :

' '

.....Respondents :

, ) , J Through ^ Mr.RajeshKumar,Advocate.

.

!

'-'GORAM:

/ HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Y.KAMESWAR RAO ; ORDER '

' • % \ 06.02.2017 CMNo. 469i5/2017(ExiemptiohVinW.P.fC^1026/2017 CM No. 4735/2017(Exemption^in W.P.(CV1Q37/Idl7 ; . The appiicationsstanddisposedof.

.

, .

W:P.(C)Nos. 1026/2017mdI037/20I7^ •' ' '

'

.

/ page1of2 By:AMULYA \ • y 1'^ .

I ., • / ,

n W.P.(a Nos. 1026/2017 and 1037/2017 There are defectsin these writ petitionsand due to inadvertence,there isno prayerfor settingasidetheorderofpunishmentimpugned. '

In view of the defects and on the prayer of Counsel appearing on behalfof the petitioners,the writ petitionsare dismissedas withdrawnwith Hbertyto file fresh writ petitions."

INDIRA BANERJEE,J V.KAMESWAR RAO, J FEBRUARY 06,2017 rs W.P.(C)Nos. 1026/2017and1037/2017 '

, '