Ashish Jain @ Ashu Jain v. State & ANR
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ASHISH JAIN @ ASHU JAIN ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. Rajesh Jain, Adv.
versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:
Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R
% The authorization of the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 in on the record.
Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks the quashing of the FIR No.761/2015, PS Krishna Nagar registered under Sections 354D/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 submitting to the effect that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and no useful purpose would be served by the continuation of the proceedings in relation to the FIR in question. The Investigating Officer of the case has identified the petitioner present today in Court as being the accused arrayed in the FIR in question and has also identified respondent no.2 present in Court today as being the
complainant of the said FIR.
The respondent no.2 has produced her original proof of identity, copy of which is on the record as Ex.CW2/A. The respondent no.2 in her examination on oath by the Court has affirmed having signed her affidavit Ex.CW2/B voluntarily of her own accord without any duress, coercion or pressure from any quarter.
She has further stated that in as much as the petitioner has since apologized to her and there are no problems now between her and the petitioner after the registration of the FIR, which was registered in the year 2015, in the circumstances, it is considered appropriate to put a quietus to the litigation and disputes between the parties for maintenance of peace and harmony between them as also for the well being of the respondent no.2 qua the FIR No.761/2015, PS Krishna Nagar registered under Sections 354D/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which is thus quashed subject to deposit of costs of Rs.25,000/- by the petitioner in the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within a week. The Registry shall put up the file on submission of the costs. The petition is disposed of.
MARCH 04, 2020 vm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI
ASHISH JAIN @ ASHU JAIN Vs. STATE & ANR CW-1 SI Jatan Singh , PS Krishna Nagar.
ON S.A.
I identify the petitioner Mr. Ashish Jain as being the accused arrayed in the FIR No.761/2015, PS Krishna Nagar registered under Sections 354D/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. I identify the respondent no.2 Ms. Swati Kundra as being the complainant of the said FIR. RO & AC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI
ASHISH JAIN @ ASHU JAIN Vs. STATE & ANR CW-2 Ms. Swati Kundra, w/o Mr. Varun Kundra, aged 30 years, r/o 107/4, St. No.9, West Azad Nagar, Krishna Nagar, Delhi. I have brought my original proof of identity, copy of which is on the record as Ex.CW2/A. My affidavit in support of the averments made in the petition bears my signatures thereon at points A & B thereon on Ex.CW2/B. Since the petitioner has apologized to me and there have been no problems between me and the petitioner after the registration of the FIR, I do not oppose the prayer made by the petitioner seeking the quashing of the FIR No.761/2015, PS Krishna Nagar registered under Sections 354D/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 nor do I want the petitioner to be punished in relation thereto.
I am a graduate and I work as an Executive Assistant.. I have made my statement voluntarily of my own accord without any duress, coercion or pressure from any quarter after understanding the implications thereof.
RO & AC