Chanderjeet Kumar @ Kishan v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 556/2016 & CRL.M.A. 3094/2016 CHANDERJEET KUMAR @ KISHAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Puneet Garg, Advocate.

versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Amrit Singh, Advocate for Mr Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 22.02.2016 Mr Amrit Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr Rahul Mehra, learned Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.), on advance notice, states that the representation for parole filed on behalf of the petitioner, which is pending determination before the competent authority, shall be disposed of in accordance with law within a period of five working days from today under intimation to the petitioner.

Directed accordingly.

In view of the above statement, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach this court in the event he is aggrieved by the decision taken by the competent authority on his representation for parole.

Leave and liberty granted. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J FEBRUARY 22, 2016 mk