← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/2302/2024

Imran Beg v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2024-07-31Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta2 pages

$~101 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2302/2024 IMRAN BEG .....Petitioner Through:

Dr.

Amarendra Pratap Yadav, Ms. Satyama Dubey and Mr. Alok Singh, Advs.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Anmol Sinha, ASC for the State with Ms. R. Rama, Mr. B. P. Agarwal, Ms. Sharanjit Kaur Shergil, Mr.

Abhishek Singh and Ms. Anjali Verma, Advocates and with SI Shalini, PS Jafrabad and ASI Devender, PS Jafrabad.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

O R D E R

% 31.07.2024 CRL.M.A. 22453/2024 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 2302/2024 1.

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ('BNSS') has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner with the following prayers: "a) This Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue directions in the nature of writ of mandamus to the respondent for lodging a criminal case under relevant provisions;"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:13:13

2.

Issue notice. Learned ASC for the State appears on advance notice and accepts notice.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is aggrieved as registration of FIR on his complaint was only under Section 137 (2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ('BNS') which provides for 'kidnapping', and other appropriate Sections have not been invoked by the investigating agency. 4.

Learned ASC for the State informs that Section 8 of POCSO Act has also been invoked during the course of investigation and further submits that petitioner/complainant shall be duly informed as and when the chargesheet/final report is filed in accordance with law. 5.

In view of invocation of Section 8 of POCSO Act by the Investigating Officer, petition is not pressed by the learned counsel for petitioner. The same is accordingly disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

JULY 31, 2024 p The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:13:13