Sakir v. The State NCT Of Delhi And ORS

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5899/2024 & CRL. M.A.22575/2024 SAKIR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kashif Anand Khan, Mr. Aahil Nawaz, Advocates with petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Mohd. Ayyoob PS Jafrabad, Delhi.

Respondent nos.2 and 3/victims/complainant in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI % 11.09.2024

O R D E R

1.

The present proceedings are instituted on behalf of the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 610/2018 registered under Sections 323/324/341 IPC at Police Station Jafrabad, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioner during heated arguments with the respondent No.1 gave injuries to him on his thumb and chest and to the respondent No.2 on the back with a scissor. 3.

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is the only accused and respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the complainant/victims in the present case. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed. Learned APP further states that considering the serious nature of averments/allegations and that the incident has taken The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

place at a public place, the petitioner may be saddled with heavy costs. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present FIR was registered due to misunderstanding and with the intervention of respectable members of society, parties have amicably settled their disputes orally on 18.05.2024 and affidavits of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in this respect have already been placed on record. In terms of the said settlement, complainants/victims are now left with no claim or grievance against the petitioner.

5.

The petitioner, who is present in Court, has been identified by his counsel as well as the I.O./ SI Mohd. Ayyoob PS Jafrabad, Delhi. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are also present in Court and have been identified by the I.O.

6.

The petitioner has shown remorse for his conduct and undertakes not to repeat the same in future. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 also state that they have entered into the compromise out of ther own free will, volition and without any coercion. They further state that they have no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed. 7.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

8.

In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority(Account No.18580110053263, UCO Bank, Branch Rouse Avenue, IFSC:

UCBA0003364) within a period of four weeks from today. The amount so The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

deposited shall be utilized by the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for providing counselling/psychological support to POCSO victims requiring such assistance.

9.

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. 10.

A copy of this order be communicated to the Member Secretary, Delhi State Legal Services Authority for intimation. 11.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous application.

12.

In case the proof of cost is not filed within two weeks, the IO shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application in this regard. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J SEPTEMBER 11, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.