Umesh Giri v. State

$~68 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3274/2019 UMESH GIRI ..... Petitioner Through Mr Adit S. Pujari, DHCLSC for Mr Archit Upadhyay, DHCLSC.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mrs Kusum Dhalla, APP for state.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 05.02.2020 1.

This petition has been listed before this Court on an office note indicating that the petitioner, who was released on parole for a period of one month pursuant to the orders dated 04.12.2019 passed by this Court, has not surrendered after completion of the said parole period. 2.

In the aforesaid circumstances, the police authorities are required to take necessary action for tracing the petitioner. In addition, steps are required to be taken for invoking the personal bond furnished by the sureties in terms of the order dated 04.12.2019.

3.

Ms Dhalla, learned APP states that further proceedings are required to be taken by the Trial Court.

4.

In view of the above, it is directed that the present matter be placed before the Trial Court for initiation of further proceedings. VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 05, 2020/pkv