High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10618/2024

Rishanlang Syiemlieh & ANR. v. Union Of India & ORS.

2024-08-22Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Rekha Palli,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Shalinder Kaur2 pages

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 10618/2024 RISHANLANG SYIEMLIEH & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Anupam Kumar Mishra, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Dr. Ramaswami, CGSC with Mr.

Amit Acharya, Govt. Pleader.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R D E R

% 22.08.2024 CM APPL. 43644/2024 -Ex.

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 10618/2024

3. The petitioners have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: "1. Issue the writ of Mandamus thereby directing the Respondents to pass orders/direct the Respondent No.3 to stop the firing and bombing practice with immediate affect and/or;

2. Issue the writ of Mandamus thereby directing the Respondents to pass orders/direct the Respondent No.3 to The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 11:52:02

relocate the Firing range away from the current place to a vacant area where there are no residents nearby."

4. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for the present the petitioners would be satisfied in case the respondents were to treat the present writ petition as their representation and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon.

5. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice and does not oppose this limited prayer.

6. In the light of the aforesaid stand taken by the parties, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to treat the present writ petition as a representation by the petitioners and decide the grievances raised therein by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 12 weeks.

7. Needless to state, since this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claims made by the petitioners, in case they are aggrieved by any order passed by the respondents, it will be open for them to seek legal recourse, as permissible in law. REKHA PALLI, J SHALINDER KAUR, J AUGUST 22, 2024 acm The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 11:52:02