← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./2629/2025

Vinod Kumar Yadav v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

2025-11-26Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vikas Mahajan2 pages

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2629/2025 VINOD KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Y.D. Sharma, Advocate.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State with SI Kaushik, PS-Swaroop Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 26.11.2025 1.

The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. (483 BNSS) seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No. 272/2024, under Section 304 IPC registered at PS Swaroop Nagar.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner caused multiple injuries by way of fist blows to the deceased (Ramesh) on his face and other parts of the body on account of which deceased (Ramesh) succumbed to his injuries.

3.

Mr. Y.D. Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that prosecution has cited following four witnesses as eye witnesses, i.e., (i) PW-1 Surender Goel; (ii) PW-2 Ravi; (iii) PW-3 Vijay Chaudhary and (iv) PW-4 Ratan Singh Yadav, all of them turned hostile. 4.

Elaborating further, he submits that none of the witnesses have identified the present petitioner.

5.

The aforesaid position is not disputed by Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, the learned APP, on instructions from the IO, who is present in Court. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2025 at 14:43:18

6.

In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is admitted on regular bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/JMFC/Duty JM, further subject to the following conditions: a. Petitioner shall appear before the Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing.

b. Petitioner shall provide mobile number to the IO concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times and he shall not change the mobile number without prior intimation to the Investigating Officer concerned.

c. Petitioner shall not come in contact with or other witnesses. 7.

The application is disposed of.

8.

Copy of the order be forwarded to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary compliance.

9.

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 26, 2025/jg The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2025 at 14:43:18