Gunita Sodhi v. Nav Auro Investment Pvt Ltd

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 764/2014 Decided on 25.03.2015

IN THE MATTER OF :

GUNITA SODHI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Advocate versus NAV AURO INVESTMENT PVT. LTD.

..... Defendant Through: Mr. M. Salim, Advocate

CORAM

HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J. (Oral) 1.

Counsels for the parties state that pursuant to the order dated 21.11.2014, when the parties were referred to the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, a Settlement Agreement dated 14.1.2015 has been placed on record.

2.

The Settlement Agreement has recorded that the defendant has acknowledged having executed necessary sale/transfer documents in respect of the suit premises in favour of the plaintiff. They have also agreed that they would not disturb the peaceful possession of the plaintiff in the suit premises.

3.

Counsels for the parties jointly state that the parties have settled all their interse disputes in terms of the agreement and the suit CS(OS) 764/2014 Page 1 of 2

may be decreed accordingly.

4.

The Court has perused the Settlement Agreement dated 14.1.2015. The same has been signed by the plaintiff and her counsel and by the counsel for the defendant as also the learned Mediator. 5.

As the counsels for the parties state that the parties have arrived at the aforesaid settlement of their own free will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarters, there appears no legal impediment in accepting the same. The Settlement Agreement is taken on record. The parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived at between them. 6.

The suit is decreed in terms of the aforesaid settlement arrived at between the parties and recorded in the Settlement Agreement, while leaving them to bear their own costs.

7.

File be consigned to the record room.

(HIMA KOHLI) MARCH 25, 2015 JUDGE sk CS(OS) 764/2014 Page 2 of 2