Mithun @ Rikki v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3917/2023 MITHUN @ RIKKI ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Sakshi Kaul, Advocate (through VC).

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl.) for the State/GNCTD with Mr. Jasraj Singh Chhabra, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 05.02.2024 1.

This is an application filed on behalf of the applicant/accused seeking regular bail in FIR No.140/2018, under Section 302 of the IPC registered at P.S. Badarpur.

2.

Learned ASC appearing on behalf of the State submits that out of the 20 witnesses cited by the prosecution, 15 witnesses have been examined and only 05 witnesses remain to be examined.

3.

In view of the above, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions of the latter, seeks leave to withdraw the present application and prays for a direction to the learned Trial Court to expedite the trial in the present case. 4.

Leave granted.

5.

The present application is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:25:45

accordingly.

6.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 7.

The learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial in the present case as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 03 months, without granting any undue adjournments to any of the parties. 8.

Copy of the order be sent to the learned Trial Court for information and compliance.

AMIT SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 5, 2024/kct The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:25:45