Commissioner Of Central Excise v. M/S S.Kumar Cable Co. & ORS.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 18.

+ CEAC 32/2005 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Kamal Nijhawan, Senior Standing counsel, Mr R. Ashok and Mr Sumit Gaur, Advocates.

versus M/S S.KUMAR, CABLE CO.

..... Respondent WITH 19.

+ CEAC 33/2005 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Kamal Nijhawan, Senior Standing counsel, Mr R. Ashok and Mr Sumit Gaur, Advocates.

versus M/S DURGA ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 30.05.2016

1. In view of letter no. C.No.V(Law)/HQ/CE/D-II/01/06 dated 1st March, 2016 received by Mr Kamal Nijhawan, learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the Appellant, it appears that the tax effect in these matters is less than the monetary limit of the Instruction No.F.No.390/Misc./163/2010JC dated 17th December, 2015 issued by the Central Board of Excise & CEAC 32 & 33 of 2005 Page 1 of 2

Customs. Accordingly, he does not press these appeals.

2. The appeals are dismissed as not pressed.

S.MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J MAY 30, 2016 MK CEAC 32 & 33 of 2005 Page 2 of 2