Vikas Bhasin v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM APP No.16200/2018 in + W.P.(C) 1725/2018 VIKAS BHASIN ..... Petitioner Through :

Ms. Shobhan Mahanti, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through :

Mr. Nikhil Goel, Ms. Gurpreet Hora and Mr. Ashutosh Ghosle, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 24.04.2018 CM APP No.16200/2018 1.

Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Nikhil Goel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

1.2 Learned counsel says that he does not wish to file a reply to the captioned application as he does not oppose the relief claimed in the application.

2.

To be noted, the only relief that the petitioner is praying is to correct the typographical error which has crept in paragraph 12.1 of the order dated 23.2.2018.

In paragraph 12.1 of the order dated 23.2.2018 the word „deactivated‟ has been incorporated, whereas, the said word should read as „activated' W.P.(C) 1725/2018

4.

As prayed, the correction sought is allowed. It is made clear that other directions contained in the order dated 23.2.2018 shall remain unaltered.

5.

The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 6.

Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J APRIL 24, 2018 mk W.P.(C) 1725/2018