Aerjun v. Tek Chand & ORS

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 91/2016 & CM No. 44821-22/2016 AERJUN ..... Appellant Through None versus TEK CHAND & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate for R-1&2 Mr.Satyakam, Standing counsel for GNCTD with Mr.Naveen Jakhar, Advocate along with ASI Raju Yadav, PS Adarsh Nagar for R-41 & 42

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 02.12.2016 None appears for the appellant despite pass-over twice. Respondent No.2 has already filed an application for disposal of the appeal on the ground that even the main suit has been rejected under Order 7 Rule 10/11 CPC vide order dated 11th November, 2016 and, therefore, nothing survives in this appeal.

Since none has appeared for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed in default as well as for non-prosecution.

SUNITA GUPTA, J DECEMBER 02, 2016 rs