Nitin Kumar @ Nitin Khatik & ORS. v. State & ANR.
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8563/2023 NITIN KUMAR @ NITIN KHATIK & ORS.
..... Petitioners Through:
Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person.
Versus
STATE & ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with ASI Yashpal, P.S. M.S. Park.
Respondent No.2 in person through V.C.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
% 15.02.2024 1.
The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 0143/2023 registered under Sections 341/323/506/195A/308/34 IPC at P.S. Mansarovar Park, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.
As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, on 18.05.2023, the petitioners threatened and gave beatings to the complainant as a result of which he sustained injuries.
3.
Mr. Sabharwal, learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim in the present case.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and respondent No. 2 have amicably settled their disputes vide Compromise The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Deed dated 19.09.2023, a copy of which has been placed on record. In terms of the said settlement, complainant is now left with no claim or grievance against the petitioners.
5.
The petitioners, who is present in Court, have been identified by the counsel as well as the I.O./ASI Yashpal, P.S. M.S. Park. Respondent No. 2, who has joined the proceedings through V.C., is also identified by the I.O. 6.
The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No. 2 also states that he has settled the disputes with the petitioners out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion. He further states that he has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.
7.
The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.
8.
In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to cost of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by each of the petitioners with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority within a period of two weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be utilized by the DSLSA for providing counselling/psychological support to POCSO victims requiring such assistance.
9.
Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. as well as in Court, failing which the Registry shall put up the matter before the Court.
10.
A copy of this order be communicated to the Member Secretary, DSLSA for intimation.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
11.
With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 15, 2024/ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.