← Library
High Court of DelhiCCP(CO.)/3/2013

Australia And New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. v. Tulip Telecom Ltd.

2016-02-09Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher1 pages

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CCP(CO.) 3/2013 AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD.

..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Ganpathy and Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Advocates versus TULIP TELECOM LTD.

..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Advocate for contemnor no.2 Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for R-3 & R-7 Mr. Suresh Chandra and Mr. Shyam Moorjani, Advocate for contemnor no.4 & 6

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 09.02.2016 Mr. Ganpati, the learned counsel for the petitioner, says that since the contemnors, in any, case have no fund available with it, he has instructions not to press the captioned petition. The captioned petition is, accordingly, disposed of. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FEBRUARY 09, 2016 yg