Maya Devi v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15300/2023 & CM APPL. 30517/2025 MAYA DEVI .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kameshwer Mishra, Advocate.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Rahul Jaryal and Mr. Pradeep Kr..Saini, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 19.05.2025 1.

This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging order dated 29.04.2022 passed by the SDM (Civil Lines) and order dated s26.09.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner in an appeal therefrom.

2.

The petition was disposed of on 09.04.2024, but the judgment was set aside by the Division Bench vide order dated 10.12.2024 in LPA No. 896/2024, and the matter was remanded back to learned Single Judge for adjudication of the disputes in accordance with law. 3.

In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the parties state that the impugned order of the SDM and the Deputy Commissioner have been challenged by the petitioner herein before the learned Financial Commissioner. In these circumstances, it is submitted that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

W.P.(C) 15300/2023 Page 1 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:34:59

4.

While seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, without prejudice to the petitioner's rights and contentions before the learned Financial Commissioner, however, Mr. Kameshwer Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that execution proceedings are in progress in terms of the impugned order of the SDM.

5.

The question of interim orders is the matter for learned Financial Commissioner to consider in the pending appeal. However, the learned Financial Commissioner is requested to consider the interim relief as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within eight weeks from today. 6.

Mr. Rahul Jaryal, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, states that the execution proceedings will not be proceeded with, until the learned Financial Commissioner has passed an order on the question of interim relief.

7.

The writ petition, alongwith pending application, is disposed of in view of the aforesaid submissions.

PRATEEK JALAN, J MAY 19, 2025 UK/AD/ W.P.(C) 15300/2023 Page 2 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:34:59