← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./8711/2023

Sunil Garg & ORS. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2024-03-13Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri2 pages

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8711/2023 & CRL.M.A. 32565/2023 SUNIL GARG & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.Satish Sharma and Ms.Mumtaz Ahmad, Advocates with petitioners in person.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Brij Mohan and SI Mahesh PS Badarpur, Delhi.

Respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 13.03.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.7/2016 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Badarpur, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and petitioner No. 1 (husband) whereas petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 are the in-laws of the complainant. 3.

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, learned APP for the State submits that petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No. 2 is the complainant/victim.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes before Mediation Centre, Saket Courts on 25.01.2019. It is stated that, the parties have already been granted divorce by mutual The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:13:58

consent. It is further stated that all payments have been made by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No. 2 towards full and final settlement. In terms of settlement, respondent No.2 is now left with no claim or grievance against the petitioners.

5.

Petitioners, who are present in Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as by I.O./ SI Brij Mohan and SI Mahesh PS Badarpur, Delhi. Respondent No.2, who is also present in Court, has been identified by the I.O.

6.

Respondent No. 2, states that she has settled her disputes with the petitioners of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She also acknowledges the receipt of entire settled amount and submits that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed against the petitioners. 7.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements and undertaking made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous applications.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 13, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:13:58