Commissioner Of Central Excise v. R.K.Mehta

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 20.

+ CEAC 11/2006 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing counsel.

versus R.K.MEHTA ..... Respondent WITH 21.

+ CEAC 12/2006 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing counsel.

versus M/S LINK INDUSTRIES ..... Respondent AND 22.

+ CEAC 13/2006 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing counsel.

versus M/S VISHAL ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU CEAC 11, 12 & 13 of 2006 Page 1 of 2

O R D E R

% 30.05.2016

1. In view of letter no. C. No. V(Law) HQ/CE/D-I/96/2006 dated 27th May, 2016 received by Mr Satish Kumar, learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the Petitioner, it appears that the tax effect in these matters is less than the monetary limit in terms of the Instruction No.F.No.390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 17th December, 2015 issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs. Accordingly, he does not press these appeals.

2. The appeals are dismissed as not pressed.

S.MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J MAY 30, 2016 MK CEAC 11, 12 & 13 of 2006 Page 2 of 2