Jyoti Arora v. The State And ANR.
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7145/2022 JYOTI ARORA .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Avinash Suri, Advocate versus THE STATE AND ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State.
with SI Hari Ram Choudhary.
Mr. Anurag Jain and Mr. MM Khan, Advocates for R-2.
(7) + CRL.M.C. 7146/2022 JYOTI ARORA .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Avinash Suri, Advocate versus THE STATE AND ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State.
Mr. Anurag Jain and Mr. MM Khan, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 30.07.2025 1.
By way of the present petitions, the petitioner is seeking following prayer:
"...1. Set aside the order Dt. 02/12/2022 passed by Shri Vishal The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2025 at 12:40:02
Gogne ASJ2/ KKD/East in bail application no. 1653/2022 listed as State Vs Amir Khan@ Raja in FIR NO. 202/ U/s 420/467/468/471/120B/34 IPC, PS Gandhi Nagar and direct the respondent no.2 Amir Khan@Raja to sun-ender forthwith and be remanded to judicial custody in the interest of justice..." 2.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner argues that the respondent no. 2 is involved in various other similar cases. It is further argued that the respondent no. 2 has committed heinous offence. Therefore, it is prayed that the order dated 02.12.2022, granted bail to the respondent no. 2 herein be set aside.
3.
This Court has heard arguments and has perused the material available on record.
4.
In the present case, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted to the respondent no. 2 vide order dated 02.12.2022 on the ground that the respondent no. 2 herein is involved in many other similar cases and also heinous offence. However, the learned counsel is not able to prove as to whether he has violated any conditions of bail while he was granted bail neither he has been able to place on record any material etc. The State also does not place on record any material that the respondent no. 2 has violated any condition of bail and has also not received any complaint after grant of bail by the concerned Court. 5.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, no ground for cancellation of bail is made out. 6.
Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed. 7.
The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JULY 30, 2025/zp The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2025 at 12:40:02