Krishan Kumar Malik v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3608/2023 KRISHAN KUMAR MALIK ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Bhandair, ASC for the State with Mr. Kunal Mittal, Mr.

Arijit Sharma and Ms. Rishika, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 08.01.2024 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that though he has stated a ground in para no. 9 of his petition that he wants parole for the purpose of filing Special Leave Petition (SLP), this ground was not mentioned in the application filed before the competent authority. Therefore, let petitioner file afresh application before the competent authority and the competent authority will decide the same within two weeks under intimation to the petitioner, and will also consider his petition as representation. 2.

In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. 3.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 8, 2024/zp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:09:00