Shubham v. The State NCT Of Delhi
$~2 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 2862/2024 SHUBHAM .....Applicant Through:
Mr. Sandeep Simpy, Advocate.
versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:
Mr.
Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State.
Inspector Ashwani (P.S.
G.T.B. Enclave).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 05.11.2024 1.
The present application is filed seeking regular bail in FIR No. 85/2021 dated 25.03.2021, registered at Police Station GTB Enclave for offences under Sections 186/353/332/307/ 224/225/482/392/397/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959. 2.
Even though the role of the applicant at this stage appears to be similar to the co-accused Ritik@ Rinku who has been admitted on bail, the serious antecedents of the applicant does not entitle him to any relief at this stage. Nominal roll indicates that the applicant, on earlier occasions, has been involved in multiple cases. The applicant is stated to be in judicial custody in these FIRs:- FIR NO.
U/S POLICE STATION STATUS 1039/2017 147/148/323/452/506 NOT ON BAIL 528/2020 307/341/34/120B BARWAL(HR) NOT ON BAIL HISAR CITY(HR) IPC The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:42:19
85/2021 302/395/397/364/34 NOT ON BAIL 81/2021 148/149/364/302 FURRUKH NAGAR(HR) IPC NOT ON BAIL 166/2021 25 Arms ACT HTM HISAR(HR) BERI JHAJJAR(HR) IPC RELEASED 272/2019 307,120B IPC HTM HISAR(HR) NOT ON BAIL 3.
The offences alleged against the applicant in these FIRs are serious in nature.
4.
Eyewitnesses are yet to be examined in the present case. 5.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that all efforts would be made to ensure that the eyewitnesses are examined expeditiously and no unwarranted adjournments would be taken.
6.
Considering the above, this Court does not consider it apposite to entertain the present application at this stage. The applicant is, however, at liberty to file a fresh application after the eyewitnesses are examined.
7.
The application is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. AMIT MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 5, 2024 'Aman'
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:42:19