Sri Kishan v. Rohtas Saini

$~R2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 138/2016 SRI KISHAN .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus ROHTAS SAINI .....Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R

% 12.12.2024 1.

None appears for the parties.

2.

The order dated 29.02.2016 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court shows that the possession of the subject property has already been taken over by the landlord.

3.

This Court in Ashok Gupta v. Deepak Rao1, relying on the judgments of the Supreme Court in NC Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh Rana2 and Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma3 has held that once the possession of the subject premises has been restored, nothing further survives in the present Petition and the Petition has become infructuous. 3.1 This Court is supported in its view by judgments passed by Coordinate Benches of this Court including Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & 1 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7148 2 (2003) 1 SCC 453 3 Civil Appeal Nos. 5220-5221 of 2008 dated 19.08.2008 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:34:16

Sons v. Ajay Khurana4, Neelam Sharma v. Ekant Rekhan5 and Bhawani Shankar v Nand Lal and Ors.6 4.

The Petitioner/tenant is also adequately protected in terms of Section 19(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

5.

The present Petition is accordingly dismissed. TARA VITASTA GANJU, J DECEMBER 12, 2024/jn Click here to check corrigendum, if any 4 2024 SCC OnLine Del 5228 5 2019 SCC Online Del 6487 6 2021 SCC OnLine Del 4284 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:34:16