Priyanka Agarwal v. Sandeep Aggarwal

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 36/2017 PRIYANKA AGARWAL ..... Appellant Represented by:

Mr.Shiv Prakash Pandey, Advocate with Mr.Raghav Pandey, Advocate with appellant in person versus SANDEEP AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Represented by:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 27.02.2017 CM No.7916/2017 Allowed.

CM No.7915/2017 For the reasons stated in the application 6 days' delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

The application is disposed of.

Mat.A.(F.C.) No.36/2017 We find no merit in the appeal for the reason the pleadings in the application under Order 7 Rule 11 are to the effect that the documents relied MAT.APP.(F.C.) 36/2017

upon by the petitioner do not inspire confidence. This would be a matter of evidence.

The appeal is dismissed.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.

FEBRUARY 27, 2017 mamta MAT.APP.(F.C.) 36/2017