Sonu @ Saad Ansari & ORS. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~29 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ SONU @ SAAD ANSARI & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Counsel (appearance not given).

Petitioners in-person.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr.

Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC (Criminal) for the State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate.

SI Suresh Kr. Meena, P.S.: New Usmanpur.

R-2 in-person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 18.02.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners and complainant/respondent No. 2, jointly seek quashing of case FIR No. 323/2025 dated 30.05.2025 registered under sections 115(2)/126(2)/308(4)/ 324(4)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ('BNS') at P.S.: New Usmanpur, Delhi.

2.

The petition is premised on Compromise Deed dated 16.07.2025, whereby the petitioners and respondent No. 2 have resolved the matter amicably.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

3.

The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioners and of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs. 4.

The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel.

5.

The court has interacted with the respondent No.2, as also with petitioners, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and Compromise Deed dated 16.07.2025 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward.

6.

Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, learned ASC confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.

7.

In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 8.

While allowing the petition however, this court considers it appropriate, that by way of atonement, the petitioners shall pay costs of Rs.5,000/- each to Friendicoes SECA, No.271 & 273, Defence Colony Flyover Market, Jungpura, New Delhi within 04 weeks. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

9.

Subject to the aforesaid condition, FIR No.

323/2025 dated 30.05.2025 registered under sections 115(2)/126(2)/308(4)/324(4)/351(2)/3(5) of BNS at P.S.:

New Usmanpur, Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed.

10.

Petitioners are directed to place on record the proof of payment of costs.

11.

The Registry is directed to re-list the matter if costs are not paid as directed.

12.

The petition stands disposed-of.

13.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J FEBRUARY 18, 2026/ak The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.