Baljeet Singh Kalkal v. Sunita

$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 9044/2023 & CRL. MA 33820/2023 BALJEET SINGH KALKAL .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Amit Chadha, Mr. Atin Chadha, Ms. Munisa Chadha, Ms. Aeshana Singh and Mr.

Harjas Singh, Advocates.

versus SUNITA .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Anil Dagar, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI % 05.08.2024

O R D E R

1.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition at this stage.

2.

Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition along with pending application is dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that since the complaint pertains to the year 2018, the trial may kindly be expedited. It is also informed that on the petitioner's application under Section 311 Cr.P.C, the concerned witness was recalled and examined and it is therefore prayed that the Trial Court may be directed to expedite the trial. 4.

Considering the aforesaid prayer, the Trial Court is requested to make an endeavour to expedite the Trial and conclude the same, preferably within a period of one year from the next date of hearing. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J AUGUST 5, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:28:04