Mohd.Gulrez & ORS. v. Abid Qureshi

$~96 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1421/2025 & CM APPL. 46781/2025 & CM APPL. 46782/2025 MOHD.GULREZ & ORS.

.....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Shekhar, Ms. Tamanna, Advs.

versus ABID QURESHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Rakesh Shrivastava, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

O R D E R

% 11.08.2025 1.

Mr. Rakesh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondent has joined proceedings on advance notice through video-conferencing. 2.

After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition.

3.

He, however, submits that it be clarified that the impugned order, whereby the amendment in the suit in question has been allowed, should not prejudice the mind of the learned Controller who is seized with application seeking leave to defend.

4.

The present petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. 5.

All the rights and the contentions of the parties are left open and it is also clarified that that the learned Controller would decide the application seeking leave to defend, without being influenced by the impugned order dated 05.07.2025. 6.

Pending applications stand disposed of in aforesaid terms. MANOJ JAIN, J AUGUST 11, 2025/neha The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 11:49:21