Mawasi Ram & ANR. v. The State ( Govt, N.C.T Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5142/2025 & CRL.M.A. 22275/2025 MAWASI RAM & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Chandan Mishra, Mr. S.S. Lathi and Mr. Mukesh, Advocates with Petitioners in person versus THE STATE (GOVT. N.C.T OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State with SI Akash Kumar, P.S.

Bhajanpura R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 01.08.2025 1.

Petition under 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the Petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 0071/2013 registered under Sections 380/448/34 IPC at P.S. Bhajanpura and all proceedings arising therefrom in terms of the Compromise Deed dated 08.07.2025. 2.

The dispute arose as the Respondent No. 2 had purchased the property from the Petitioners but she had forcibly occupied the property and also removed the belongings of the Respondent No. 2 due to which FIR No. 0071/2013 was registered.

3.

The parties are present in person in the Court and have been identified by the IO.

4.

The parties have endorsed the amicable settlement vide Compromise The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/08/2025 at 12:05:25

Deed dated 08.07.2025 and accepted the terms thereof voluntarily and they submit that the said Settlement has been arrived at between the parties, without any pressure and coercion and that they shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement.

5.

The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled vide Compromise Deed dated 08.07.2025 and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR. 6.

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the Respondent No. 2 has no objection if the FIR is quashed, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

7.

Accordingly, considering the nature of the allegations and the compromise arrived at between the parties, the FIR No. 0071/2013 registered under Sections 380/448/34 IPC at P.S. Bhajanpura and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 8.

The Petition alongwith pending Application, stands disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J AUGUST 1, 2025 N The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/08/2025 at 12:05:25