High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1009/2016
Suresh Chand Pathak v. State
2018-08-07Hon'Ble Mr. Justice R.K.Gauba1 pages
$~24 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 1009/2016 SURESH CHAND PATHAK ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. G.D. Sharma, Adv.
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:
Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Baljinder Singh, PS Darya Ganj.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
O R D E R
% 07.08.2018 It was conceded on the previous date that the address of the second respondent, as given, is not complete.
Opportunity was given for proper steps to be taken including filing of the address of second respondent on an affidavit. No steps were taken.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. R.K.GAUBA, J AUGUST 07, 2018 nk