Siddharth Sahib Singh v. Apex Council Of Ddca & ANR.
$~10 to 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 685/2023 SIDDHARTH SAHIB SINGH .....Appellant Through:
Mr. Samar Bansal and Mr. Zeeshan Deewan, Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Ms. Anushka Singhal, Ms. Siddhi Nagwekar, Ms. Yashi Bajpai, Mr. Yash Tayal, Ms. Shubhanshi Phogat, Advs.
versus APEX COUNCIL OF DDCA .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. T.
Singhdev, Mr. Bhanu Gulati, Mr.
Saurab Chadda, Mr. Abhijit, Mr.
Tanishq, Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Vidant Sood, Ms. Ramanpreet Kaur, Mr.
Saurav Kumar, Advs. for DDCA + LPA 824/2023, CM APPL. 65124/2023, CM APPL. 65125/2023 & CM APPL. 65126/2023 SIDDHARTH SAHIB SINGH .....Appellant Through:
Mr. Samar Bansal and Mr. Zeeshan Deewan, Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Ms. Anushka Singhal, Ms. Siddhi Nagwekar, Ms. Yashi Bajpai, Mr. Yash Tayal, Ms. Shubhanshi Phogat, Advs.
versus APEX COUNCIL OF DDCA & ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. T.
Singhdev, Mr. Bhanu Gulati, Mr.
Saurab Chadda, Mr. Abhijit, Mr.
Tanishq, Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Vidant Sood, Ms. Ramanpreet Kaur, Mr.
Saurav Kumar, Advs. for DDCA + LPA 90/2024 & CM APPL. 6189/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2025 at 12:26:43
H. R. SHARMA .....Appellant Through:
Mr. Akshay Ringe and Ms. Ishanee Kapoor, Ms. Janhavi Negi, Advs.
versus DELHI AND DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. T.
Singhdev, Mr. Bhanu Gulati, Mr.
Saurab Chadda, Mr. Abhijit, Mr.
Tanishq, Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Vidant Sood, Ms. Ramanpreet Kaur, Mr.
Saurav Kumar, Advs. for DDCA
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
% 18.11.2025 5.
Heard learned counsel representing the parties. 6.
Learned counsel representing the appellant in all these appeals have stated that by efflux of time, the appeals have been rendered infructuous. 7.
Accordingly, the present appeals along with pending applications stand dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered infructuous. 8.
However, the issue as to whether the order or any decision passed or taken by the Ombudsman is appealable under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India and whether such a petition is maintainable, is left open to be decided in some other matter, if the same arises in future. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025/j The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2025 at 12:26:43