Rajeev Chahal And ANR & ANR. v. Kiaasa Retail Pvt Ltd

$~20 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 661/2023 RAJEEV CHAHAL AND ANR & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Sushant Dahiya, Ms. Faguni Katyal, Advocates.

versus KIAASA RETAIL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanyam Rastogi, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 24.01.2024 1.

By way of this petition under Section 29 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioners seek extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitrator, who is in seisin of disputes between the parties under a Lease Deed dated 28.02.2020.

2.

The Arbitral Tribunal was constituted by an order of this Court dated 05.04.2022 in ARB.P. 87/2022. I am informed that arbitral proceedings have concluded, and the award has been reserved by the learned arbitrator.

3.

Mr. Sanyam Rastogi, learned counsel for the respondent, enters appearance and states that the respondent has no objection to the application being allowed.

4.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 661/2023 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:31:08

allowed, and the mandate of the learned arbitrator is extended for a period of six months with effect from 16.09.2023, when it last expired. PRATEEK JALAN, J JANUARY 24, 2024 'Bhupi'/ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 661/2023 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:31:08